[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[[email protected] (William J. Evans)] April 1 considered harmful
Well, folks, wopr.ml.org is back on the network and bringing debatably
funny material to you once again.
-mph
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 13:29:58 -0800
From: [email protected] (William J. Evans)
Subject: April 1 considered harmful
Our esteemed PGN commented with respected to the alleged PENPAL virus:
: Too bad we were not approaching 1 April instead of 1 Jan.
We need to address the risks involved in even _having_ a 1 April in the
calendar. What if a powerful newbie takes a 1 April prank seriously, and
dives in to "fix" something? What are the risks there?
Alternatively, what are the risks of expanding March to 32 days and starting
April with 2 April?
Would that be any worse than the upcoming Y2K?
Sorry, but I couldn't wait three months to submit this. Too bad we're
not approaching 1 April instead of 1 Jan.
Bill Evans/Box 4829/Irvine, California 92716/(714)551-2766 [email protected]
------- End of forwarded message -------
--
This message comes to you as a service of the mph-humor list. No
claims of real or perceived humor are offered.
Sumbissions: [email protected]
Information: http://wopr.ml.org/~hunt/mph-humor.html